A brave albeit misguided peer (I use the term loosely to confer respect on him), tried to use economic theory to explain why the ManStallion combined decathlon score is lower than the team combined decathlon score. He was close, but alas, misinformed. Apparently he has never heard the age-old adage, "A ManStallion never gives 100%, because to create another Earth would be superfluous." Obviously the reason for our lower score is that we like to foster an atmosphere of competition; it wouldn't be very fun for anyone if I ran the 100m in 3.72 seconds at every meet would it?
Guest write:
"In honor of my Business Econ midterm tomorrow which I have been studying for feverishly, I would like to take this opportunity to point that it is the Low-Hanging Fruit Principle is responsible for the team's victory over the ManStallions. That is to say, by specializing, the production possibility curve is expanded. Being the "jack-of-all-trades" is mighty cool, but not efficient."
I respond:
In honor of my being superior to you I will clarify this difficult (for you) principle as it relates to ManStallions.
The low-hanging fruit principle, in general, states that those tasks that are relatively easily accomplished and yield relatively large improvements should be completed first. For instance, if I were tasked with revamping Emory's culture*, I would first start with those areas that were easy to finish and yielded large gains. I would establish protocols making it impossible for anyone from Long Island to gain admission (an easy filter) which would then increase average coolness, decrease prominence of tights as pants, and free up those tables outside Cox (large improvements).
That being said, lets apply this principle to Emory Track and Field. Lets say that the task at hand is winning conference (scoring as many points as possible). How do I go about this? I take someone remarkably talented, train them in many events (easy; especially if its a ManStallion) and set them loose to score in many different events (Large improvements)! I think Coach Curtin may have a degree in economics! Instead of wasting their time with fragile sprinters who may, in any given meet, compete in, say, 4 events, we've invested in ManStallions who train for 10 events and will probably win all of them because everyone else will withdraw for fear of being embarrassed.
*They did ask me to do this over the summer; I declined as I was busy refurbishing train stations to make them more efficient in the area of heat retention and designing suspension bridges for Denmark